6600 Xt Vs 2060 Super
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super vs AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
Price now 360$
Games supported 100%
Toll now 407$
Games supported 100%
Full general info
Comparing of graphics carte architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters.
| Place in operation rating | 53 | 60 |
| Value for money | 78.74 | 66.28 |
| Architecture | Turing (2018−2021) | Navi / RDNA2 (2020−2022) |
| GPU code name | Turing TU106 | Navi 23 |
| Market segment | Desktop | Desktop |
| Release appointment | 2 July 2019 (3 years ago) | thirty July 2021 (less than a year agone) |
| Launch price (MSRP) | $399 | $379 |
| Price at present | $360 (0.9x MSRP) | $407 (1.1x MSRP) |
Value for money
To go the index we compare the characteristics of video cards and their relative prices.
Technical specs
Full general functioning parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and adding speed. These parameters indirectly speak of performance, simply for precise assessment yous have to consider their benchmark and gaming examination results. Note that power consumption of some graphics cards tin can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially when overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 2176 | no data |
| Core clock speed | 1470 MHz | no data |
| Boost clock speed | 1650 MHz | no data |
| Number of transistors | 10,800 one thousand thousand | 11,060 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Thermal design power (TDP) | 175 Watt | no information |
| Texture fill rate | 224.4 | 331.4 |
Compatibility, dimensions and requirements
Data on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future calculator configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop video cards it's interface and motorbus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | PCIe 3.0 x16 | PCIe 4.0 x8 |
| Length | 229 mm | 190 mm |
| Width | 2-slot | 2-slot |
| Supplementary power connectors | 1x 8-pivot | no information |
Memory
Parameters of retentiveness installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Notation that GPUs integrated into processors accept no dedicated VRAM and utilise a shared function of system RAM.
| Memory type | GDDR6 | no data |
| Maximum RAM amount | 8 GB | no information |
| Memory double-decker width | 256 Chip | no data |
| Retentiveness clock speed | 14000 MHz | no data |
| Retention bandwidth | 448.0 GB/southward | no data |
| Shared memory | - | - |
Video outputs and ports
Types and number of video connectors present on the reviewed GPUs. As a rule, data in this section is precise only for desktop reference ones (so-called Founders Edition for NVIDIA chips). OEM manufacturers may change the number and type of output ports, while for notebook cards availability of certain video outputs ports depends on the laptop model rather than on the card itself.
| Display Connectors | 1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort, 1x USB Blazon-C | 1x HDMI, 2x DisplayPort |
| HDMI | + | no data |
| G-SYNC support | + | no information |
Technologies
Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.
API support
APIs supported, including particular versions of those APIs.
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_1) | no data |
| Shader Model | 6.5 | six.5 |
| OpenGL | four.6 | no data |
| OpenCL | i.2 | no data |
| Vulkan | 1.2.131 | no data |
| CUDA | 7.5 | no data |
Benchmark performance
Non-gaming benchmark operation comparison. Note that overall benchmark functioning is measured in points in 0-100 range.
Overall score
This is our combined benchmark functioning rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, simply if you lot find some perceived inconsistencies, feel costless to speak upwards in comments department, we usually prepare issues quickly.
- Passmark
- 3DMark Vantage Operation
- 3DMark 11 Performance GPU
- 3DMark Cloud Gate GPU
- 3DMark Fire Strike Score
- 3DMark Fire Strike Graphics
- 3DMark Ice Storm GPU
This is probably the nigh ubiquitous criterion, function of Passmark PerformanceTest suite. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under diverse load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, x, 11 and 12 (the concluding beingness done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more than tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Benchmark coverage: 25%
3DMark Vantage is an outdated DirectX 10 benchmark using 1280x1024 screen resolution. It taxes the graphics card with two scenes, one depicting a girl escaping some militarized base located within a ocean cave, the other displaying a space fleet assail on a defenseless planet. It was discontinued in April 2017, and Time Spy benchmark is now recommended to exist used instead.
Benchmark coverage: 17%
3DMark eleven is an obsolete DirectX 11 benchmark past Futuremark. Information technology used four tests based on two scenes, 1 beingness few submarines exploring the submerged wreck of a sunken send, the other is an abased temple deep in the jungle. All the tests are heavy with volumetric lighting and tessellation, and despite being done in 1280x720 resolution, are relatively taxing. Discontinued in Jan 2020, 3DMark 11 is at present superseded past Time Spy.
Benchmark coverage: 16%
Cloud Gate is an outdated DirectX 11 feature level ten benchmark that was used for home PCs and basic notebooks. It displays a few scenes of some weird space teleportation device launching spaceships into unknown, using stock-still resolution of 1280x720. Simply like Ice Storm criterion, it has been discontinued in Jan 2020 and replaced by 3DMark Night Raid.
Criterion coverage: 13%
Fire Strike is a DirectX 11 criterion for gaming PCs. It features two separate tests displaying a fight between a humanoid and a fiery creature seemingly fabricated of lava. Using 1920x1080 resolution, Burn down Strike shows off some realistic enough graphics and is quite taxing on hardware.
Benchmark coverage: xiii%
Water ice Storm Graphics is an obsolete benchmark, part of 3DMark suite. Ice Storm was used to mensurate entry level laptops and Windows-based tablets operation. It utilizes DirectX 11 feature level 9 to display a battle between two infinite fleets about a frozen planet in 1280x720 resolution. Discontinued in January 2020, it is at present superseded by 3DMark Night Raid.
Criterion coverage: 8%
Gaming functioning
Permit'due south meet how skillful the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across unlike resolutions:
| Full Hard disk drive | 124 | 133 |
| 1440p | 80 | 77 |
| 4K | 53 | 43 |
Full Hd
Low Preset
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 79 +0% | 79 +0% |
Total Hard disk drive
Medium Preset
| Assassin's Creed Odyssey | 101 +90.half dozen% | 50−55 −90.6% |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 81 −59.three% | 129 +59.three% |
| Battlefield 5 | 117 +121% | 50−55 −121% |
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 141 +166% | 50−55 −166% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 78 +0% | 78 +0% |
| Far Cry 5 | 114 −32.v% | 151 +32.5% |
| Far Weep New Dawn | 105 −24.8% | 131 +24.8% |
| Forza Horizon iv | 152 +187% | 50−55 −187% |
| Hitman 3 | 135 −63.7% | 221 +63.seven% |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 102 −34.3% | 137 +34.iii% |
| Reddish Expressionless Redemption ii | 106 +100% | 50−55 −100% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 114 −45.6% | 166 +45.6% |
| Lookout Dogs: Legion | 104 −15.four% | 120 +fifteen.4% |
Full HD
High Preset
| Assassin'south Creed Odyssey | 85 +60.4% | 50−55 −60.4% |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 68 −55.nine% | 106 +55.9% |
| Battleground 5 | 101 +90.vi% | 50−55 −90.6% |
| Phone call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 117 +121% | 50−55 −121% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 72 −v.half-dozen% | 76 +5.6% |
| Far Cry v | 110 −28.2% | 141 +28.2% |
| Far Weep New Dawn | 101 −25.7% | 127 +25.7% |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 147 +177% | fifty−55 −177% |
| Hitman 3 | 125 −46.4% | 183 +46.4% |
| Horizon Nil Dawn | 77 −41.half dozen% | 109 +41.6% |
| Metro Exodus | 75 −26.7% | 95 +26.7% |
| Reddish Dead Redemption 2 | 59 +eleven.three% | l−55 −eleven.three% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 105 −35.two% | 142 +35.ii% |
| The Witcher 3: Wild Chase | 155 −thirteen.5% | 176 +13.5% |
| Lookout man Dogs: Legion | ninety −15.6% | 104 +15.6% |
Full HD
Ultra Preset
| Assassin'southward Creed Odyssey | 61 +15.ane% | fifty−55 −15.1% |
| Assassin'due south Creed Valhalla | 61 −23% | 75 +23% |
| Battlefield 5 | 93 +75.5% | l−55 −75.5% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 61 −xiii.ane% | 69 +13.1% |
| Far Weep 5 | 104 −27.nine% | 133 +27.9% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 91 −23.ane% | 112 +23.1% |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 120 +126% | l−55 −126% |
| The Witcher iii: Wild Chase | 83 −nineteen.3% | 99 +nineteen.3% |
| Lookout man Dogs: Legion | 59 −iii.4% | 61 +3.4% |
1440p
High Preset
| Call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 80 +50.ix% | 50−55 −50.9% |
| Hitman three | 85 −31.eight% | 112 +31.8% |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 54 −40.seven% | 76 +xl.7% |
| Metro Exodus | 46 −21.7% | 56 +21.7% |
| Red Dead Redemption two | 38 −39.v% | 50−55 +39.5% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | lxx −twenty% | 84 +xx% |
1440p
Ultra Preset
| Assassinator's Creed Odyssey | 52 −1.9% | fifty−55 +1.9% |
| Assassinator's Creed Valhalla | 47 −19.ane% | 56 +xix.1% |
| Battlefield 5 | 74 +39.6% | 50−55 −39.6% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 39 −ii.6% | twoscore +ii.six% |
| Far Weep 5 | 84 −25% | 105 +25% |
| Far Cry New Dawn | 81 −21% | 98 +21% |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 98 +84.nine% | fifty−55 −84.ix% |
| Watch Dogs: Legion | 44 +0% | 44 +0% |
4K
High Preset
| Phone call of Duty: Modern Warfare | 46 −15.2% | fifty−55 +xv.2% |
| Hitman three | 46 −23.nine% | 57 +23.9% |
| Horizon Zero Dawn | 31 −25.8% | 39 +25.8% |
| Metro Exodus | 30 −xiii.three% | 34 +13.3% |
| Red Dead Redemption two | 24 −121% | 50−55 +121% |
| Shadow of the Tomb Raider | 37 −eight.1% | twoscore +8.ane% |
| The Witcher iii: Wild Chase | 58 +7.4% | 54 −seven.4% |
4K
Ultra Preset
| Assassin'due south Creed Odyssey | 35 −51.4% | 50−55 +51.4% |
| Assassin's Creed Valhalla | 29 +3.6% | 28 −3.vi% |
| Battlefield v | 48 −x.4% | 50−55 +10.4% |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 18 +28.vi% | 14 −28.6% |
| Far Cry v | 45 −13.three% | 51 +xiii.3% |
| Far Weep New Dawn | 49 −8.2% | 53 +8.2% |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 67 +26.four% | 50−55 −26.4% |
| Spotter Dogs: Legion | 25 +four.2% | 24 −iv.two% |
Advantages and disadvantages
| Performance rating | 55.34 | 53.24 |
| Novelty | 2 July 2019 | 30 July 2021 |
| Cost | $399 | $379 |
| Chip lithography | 12 nm | 7 nm |
Technical Urban center couldn't determine between
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super
and
AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT
The differences in operation seem likewise small-scale.
Should you lot notwithstanding have questions concerning choice between the reviewed GPUs, enquire them in Comments section, and nosotros shall respond.
Bandage your vote
Do you think we are correct or mistaken in our choice? Vote by clicking "Like" push near your favorite graphics card.
Competitors of GeForce RTX 2060 Super past AMD
We believe that the nearest equivalent to GeForce RTX 2060 Super from AMD is Radeon RX 6700, which is nearly equal in speed and higher past 1 position in our rating.
Hither are some closest AMD rivals to GeForce RTX 2060 Super:
Competitors of Radeon RX 6600 XT by NVIDIA
The nearest Radeon RX 6600 XT's NVIDIA equivalent is GeForce RTX 2070, which is faster by 1% and higher by 3 positions in our rating.
Here are some closest NVIDIA rivals to Radeon RX 6600 XT:
Like GPU comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance more than or less close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
User rating
Hither you can run across the user rating of the graphics cards, likewise as rate them yourself.
Charge per unit NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 Super on a scale of 1 to 5:
Rate AMD Radeon RX 6600 XT on a calibration of 1 to 5:
Questions and comments
Hither you lot tin can ask a question about this comparing, agree or disagree with our judgements, or written report an error or mismatch.
Graphics settings
Screen resolution
FPS
Source: https://technical.city/en/video/GeForce-RTX-2060-Super-vs-Radeon-RX-6600-XT
0 Response to "6600 Xt Vs 2060 Super"
Post a Comment